CONTACT
US!
For more information, contact us via email at mrc@rsmas.miami.edu
MIAMI RIVER
COMMISSION
c/o Rosenstiel School
4600 Rickenbacker Cswy,
Miami, Fl. 33149
305-361-4850
Fax: 305-361-4755
e-mail: mrc@rsmas.miami.edu
This site
prepared and designed by
Mark Sell Communications, Inc. Public Relations
|
MIAMI
RIVER COMMISSION
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE MINUTES:
Minutes
of meeting
|
FEB. 16, 2000
NOON
(THIS IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT)
|
Discussions:
Jim
McDonald opened the meeting and all members provided self-introductions.
Phil Everingham provided a report on the Miami River Economic Impact
Study. Phil briefly advised the Dr. Ken Lipner, an economist with FAU,
has been asked to help the MRC in completing an economic study of the
river. Dr. Lipner was involved with prior river studies and is very
familiar with international shipping trade and how to extract statistics
from Customs and Army Corps port data. The economic study is to show the
value of the river and provide economic support for the dredging
project. This study will attempt to include not only the shipping
industry, but also the pleasure boat industry, commercial fishing
industry, restaurants on the river and hotel and Inns along the river. A
meeting is scheduled with the Beacon Council on February 23, 2000 ,with
a Dr. Crowder who was involved in the 1991 Beacon Council study of the
river. The MRC wants to be able to address the number of jobs that are
related to the river. The County is completing a tax-based study of
river properties for the possibility of creating a tax increment
financing district. This tax information will also be part of our
economic study.
Patty
Allen provided an overview of downtown development. DDA is very actively
involved with several developers for riverfront projects. Patty
discussed projects by Harvey Taylor and Terremark on the river that
involve mixed-use that have components of residential arid commercial.
Both of these developers have met with the Trust for Public Land and the
Greenway master planner, Chuck Flink. Patty is encouraged by the
different developments on the River and believes the mixed use component
with commercial retail and residential benefits the riverfront and
riverwalk development. Mark Buchbinder from HUD believes many of the
properties west of downtown can be developed as affordable or
middle-income communities.
Discussion
ensued about the development of the waterfront for water related or
boating access. Cleve Jones opened discussion concerning a riverfront
property that was not being used for marine related uses and he was
concerned about the loss of boat slips on the river Cleve was very
concerned about a property that the city was amending the zoning from
marine industrial to high density residential. This property is next to
a large marina and the local community is concerned about a high rise
building in the area. This zoning change also exacerbates the problem of
residential next to commercial marine business. Residents like to sleep
at night and many marine businesses are 24-hour operations. The Quality
of Life Working Group is working on a joint City and County urban infill
plan to update the old master plan of the Miami River. Right now the MRC
is working on several problems with specific projects along the river
that are the result of poor zoning and recently the haphazard zoning
amendments that allow specific developments only because it provides a
revenue source but does do not conform to proper urban development
guidelines. A new urban infill plan is clearly necessary and the QOL
group is pursuing this endeavor,
Dianne
Johnson advised that many water-related developments are limited or not
feasible because of the restrictions created by the Manatee Protection
Plan (MPP). Jim McDonald believes there is one common theme, which is
access to the river by boat and from the shore. Jim is concerned that
river boating access relating to dockage and slips and waterfront docks
at restaurants is limited. Ash Bullard echoed the fact that water access
is important and suggested that zoning plans should be updated. Dianne
Johnson stated that the master plan is updated only as needed.
Discussion
returned to whether this committee should provide a recommendation about
the property zoning change from marine industrial to high-density
residential. Phil Everingham advised the group that several potential
purchasers of the property wanted to develop the property for marine
business but were not allowed because of DERM regulations. If this is
factual, it is a major problem where the zoning is for marine industrial
and a regulatory agency prohibits its use as marine industrial. Imagine
the position of the property owner attempting to sell the property. The
committee determined that it is would be prudent to invite the property
owner to our next meeting to explain the situation. Cleve Jones stated
the property owner works for him and the problem is that DERM has denied
every marine related proposal for the property and that is why he asked
for a zoning change.
Jim
McDonald and the committee membership felt this was an opportunity to
request the property owner, real estate agent, DERM Director and
Commissioner Barreiro come to our next meeting to hear the facts and
fully understand this important and potentially precedent- setting
issue. David Miller will inform the above entities and schedule this
issue for the next meeting.
Bob
Schwartrich from the City provided information about brownflelds
initiatives and the committee felt Bob should provide a more detailed
briefing on this important issue at a future meeting.
The
meeting concluded at 1:20 PM.
|